I haven't heard of a procedure that exists as you define it but I know of some patients who have had reconstruction with what is left of the rectum ( if there is any left) and providing there is enough left.My doctor advised me since I was experiencing more 'liquid' stools than not ( in spite of my diet) that I would probably have the same problem if I were reconstructed ( and then the runny stool would pose a problem) Can anyone say "Diaper-time" It was probably better to collect this problematic waste in a bag than a diaper. He also said that since there was only about a thumbs length of rectum left it would prove to be a VERY difficult reconstruction if attempted which he strongly advised against. I originally looked forward to any reconstruction until I talked to this new surgeon ( the surgeon who did the resection retired this year). There was no mention of any other alternatives like rebuilding the anal canal, so I assumed that that was not an option, or at least one that I could afford.
So I have learned to accept it as it is. The good thing is I don't have to sit on toilets any more, and I save a little on toilet paper (although I use more paper towels)
On 5/11/2007
Nanjvd wrote:
Has anyone heard of a procedure where they reconstruction your intenstents to form a "new" anus for rectal cancer patients that have a permanent cologomasty bag.
thanks