Re: Gardasil (HPV - Help Pay for Vioxx) vaccine

Take note: NVIC (Nat'l Vaccine Info Center (NVIC.org) just published another finding re: the side effects and deaths that have occurred among girls who have received this toxic vaccine. What is not discussed in corporate media, which conveniently is owned in part by drug cos., is the 675 micrograms of reactive aluminum in the 3-shot series. 17 girls have died in clinical trials and 85% of 1200 recipients have had severe side effects ranging from myalgia, asthma, facial paralysis, seizures, loss of consciousness and Guillain-Barre syndrome.  These trials were rushed thanks to Merck who is trying to be the first on the market w/an HPV vaccine. Glaxco-Smith-Kline is close on their heels w/their own version.

Appx. $5 million has been given by Merck to market this vaccine through advocacy groups promoted by Merck in state gov'ts. Here in CO, sponsors in "Women in Gov't" worked alongside Merck to attempt a mandate requiring their vaccine in schools. It backfired as Merck was advised to back off due to collusion w/state officials in states such as TX whereby Gov. Rick Perry had staff w/Merck ties. Transparency anyone? Parental groups have rallied to defeat this mandate and the bill was killed. However, it was to surface in other bills, one in particular which took $1.5 million from preventative programs such as cervical screenings and pap smears which have reduced the rate of HPV by 75-80%.  90% of HPV clears by itself naturally.  These monies were then allocated to the state "health" dept. which is doing the bidding of Merck. The revolving door between Pharma and state and national officials such as those on advisory boards for the NIH, CDC, FDA, American Academy of Pediatricians, etc. is alarming.  Forget about objectivity or consumers being represented on these boards. Doctors w/drug patents are the norm on these boards and blanket denials of any wrong-doing re: drug and vaccine injuries/deaths are par for the course.

The HPV vaccine is particularly worrisome insofar as safety and efficacy.  What safeguards are in place to reimburse patients/families for damages incurred by this neuro-toxic vaccine? None, I'm afraid as they are off the hook as insurance cos. are now mandated to cover the cost of the shot (avg. $360 for the 3-shot regimen). The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC.org) has an adverse events reporting system to record and monitor vaccine injuries.  They have been receiving inquiries and reports since this vaccine came on the market a year ago of injuries and deaths have and are being reported. 

Google search "Dr. Hugh Fudenberg" for more info on vaccine dangers, in particular flu shots which also contain high levels of aluminum, a known neuro-toxin.  www.thinktwice.com  is also very informative.

Check out your state's allowable exemptions which include philosophical, religious and medical exemptions.  Vaccines are NOT mandatory for school admittance.  Filling out an immunization schedule which has exemptions on the back side is.  It's your choice NOT to vaccinate. Having spoken w/7 doctors since starting research 25 years ago and meeting families whose children have been permanently damaged or have died led me to the decision not to vaccinate my own children. They are now teenagers and are among the healthiest of children.  Years ago I met an admitting nurse at Denver Health who said after working 17 years in this position, she found that the healthiest of children were those that were NOT vaccinated.  Putting neuro-toxic ingredients such as formaldehyde, aluminum, thimerosol (49.6% ethyl mercury), diethylene glycol (anti-freeze), neomycin, streptomycin, squalene, etc. led me to conclude that vaccines do not confer immunity, but compromise it.

Autism, which is now 1 in 150 children and was 1 in 10,000 in 1982, is the #1 developmental disability in CA.  ADHD, asthma, diabetes are results of compromised immune systems due to an increasing toxic load on one's immune system. By the time a child is in 1st grade, they've received 60 doses of 17 vaccines. Naturally occurring measles, mumps and chickenpox are necessary immune stimulants and prevent more serious dis-eases down the road such as MS, ALS, lupus, CFS, etc. 

Polio and other viruses were already on their way out by 90-95% prior to the vaccines coming onto the market due to better sanitation methods and chlorination of water supplies.  Polio is a water-borne organism which thrives in dirty water such as that found in India and other 3rd world countries.  However, the drug cos. having spent millions and many years, were not about to throw out the baby w/the bathwater, so to speak, and instead took credit for polio's demise. 

Money and fear are what drives this machine and drug cos. do not make $$ off of healthy people.  As my sister-in-law and friend who are pharmaceutical reps stated, "the drug cos.' motto is 'womb to tomb, a customer for life' ".  Just say "no" to drugs.

On 5/26/2007 Sophierox wrote:

Take note: NVIC (Nat'l Vaccine Info Center (NVIC.org) just published another finding re: the side effects and deaths that have occurred among girls who have received this toxic vaccine. What is not discussed in corporate media, which conveniently is owned in part by drug cos., is the 675 micrograms of reactive aluminum in the 3-shot series. 17 girls have died in clinical trials and 85% of 1200 recipients have had severe side effects ranging from myalgia, asthma, facial paralysis, seizures, loss of consciousness and Guillain-Barre syndrome.  These trials were rushed thanks to Merck who is trying to be the first on the market w/an HPV vaccine. Glaxco-Smith-Kline is close on their heels w/their own version.

Appx. $5 million has been given by Merck to market this vaccine through advocacy groups promoted by Merck in state gov'ts. Here in CO, sponsors in "Women in Gov't" worked alongside Merck to attempt a mandate requiring their vaccine in schools. It backfired as Merck was advised to back off due to collusion w/state officials in states such as TX whereby Gov. Rick Perry had staff w/Merck ties. Transparency anyone? Parental groups have rallied to defeat this mandate and the bill was killed. However, it was to surface in other bills, one in particular which took $1.5 million from preventative programs such as cervical screenings and pap smears which have reduced the rate of HPV by 75-80%.  90% of HPV clears by itself naturally.  These monies were then allocated to the state "health" dept. which is doing the bidding of Merck. The revolving door between Pharma and state and national officials such as those on advisory boards for the NIH, CDC, FDA, American Academy of Pediatricians, etc. is alarming.  Forget about objectivity or consumers being represented on these boards. Doctors w/drug patents are the norm on these boards and blanket denials of any wrong-doing re: drug and vaccine injuries/deaths are par for the course.

The HPV vaccine is particularly worrisome insofar as safety and efficacy.  What safeguards are in place to reimburse patients/families for damages incurred by this neuro-toxic vaccine? None, I'm afraid as they are off the hook as insurance cos. are now mandated to cover the cost of the shot (avg. $360 for the 3-shot regimen). The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC.org) has an adverse events reporting system to record and monitor vaccine injuries.  They have been receiving inquiries and reports since this vaccine came on the market a year ago of injuries and deaths have and are being reported. 

Google search "Dr. Hugh Fudenberg" for more info on vaccine dangers, in particular flu shots which also contain high levels of aluminum, a known neuro-toxin.  www.thinktwice.com  is also very informative.

Check out your state's allowable exemptions which include philosophical, religious and medical exemptions.  Vaccines are NOT mandatory for school admittance.  Filling out an immunization schedule which has exemptions on the back side is.  It's your choice NOT to vaccinate. Having spoken w/7 doctors since starting research 25 years ago and meeting families whose children have been permanently damaged or have died led me to the decision not to vaccinate my own children. They are now teenagers and are among the healthiest of children.  Years ago I met an admitting nurse at Denver Health who said after working 17 years in this position, she found that the healthiest of children were those that were NOT vaccinated.  Putting neuro-toxic ingredients such as formaldehyde, aluminum, thimerosol (49.6% ethyl mercury), diethylene glycol (anti-freeze), neomycin, streptomycin, squalene, etc. led me to conclude that vaccines do not confer immunity, but compromise it.

Autism, which is now 1 in 150 children and was 1 in 10,000 in 1982, is the #1 developmental disability in CA.  ADHD, asthma, diabetes are results of compromised immune systems due to an increasing toxic load on one's immune system. By the time a child is in 1st grade, they've received 60 doses of 17 vaccines. Naturally occurring measles, mumps and chickenpox are necessary immune stimulants and prevent more serious dis-eases down the road such as MS, ALS, lupus, CFS, etc. 

Polio and other viruses were already on their way out by 90-95% prior to the vaccines coming onto the market due to better sanitation methods and chlorination of water supplies.  Polio is a water-borne organism which thrives in dirty water such as that found in India and other 3rd world countries.  However, the drug cos. having spent millions and many years, were not about to throw out the baby w/the bathwater, so to speak, and instead took credit for polio's demise. 

Money and fear are what drives this machine and drug cos. do not make $$ off of healthy people.  As my sister-in-law and friend who are pharmaceutical reps stated, "the drug cos.' motto is 'womb to tomb, a customer for life' ".  Just say "no" to drugs.

Thank you Shemay.  Unfortunately most people regard their doctors as God and don't realize they don't have all the answers.  My own grandfather was a well-known and highly respected doctor of his time and would educate his patients on keeping themselves healthy through eating correctly, exercising, etc.  He would give them the info and allow them to make an informed decision themselves.  He only prescribed drugs when absolutely necessary and back then, there were relatively few drugs and a lot more healthy people as a result.  The FDA has estimated that over 90% of drugs prescribed are for side-effects and most of these are maintenance medications.  They want you on them as long as possible = more profits.  A healthy client does not add to the bottom line. 

There are certain provinces in China whereby doctors are only paid when their patients are healthy.  The allopathic medical system here would collapse if that were the case.  Of course, Chinese doctors believe in using modalities such as acupuncture which has been around for over 5,000 years and using herbal medicine which has been in existence before man.  Preventative "medicine" is the best course of action, however doctors have very few hours in their education to study nutritional healing. They have figured you can make more $$ in prescribing drugs than in prescribing a healthy diet/exercise. 

The collapse of the drug market is inevitable as more scams are uncovered i.e. Vioxx, which has 27,400 lawsuits pending.  Merck hopes to increase shareholder profits by marketing their Gardasil vaccine (HPV=help pay for Vioxx)  to the tune of $4 billion a year.  They also have to shore up profits as the IRS recently nailed them for $2.4 billion in unpaid taxes from hidden assets in offshore accounts.  According to my friend and sister-in-law who are drug reps, they are hurting and are desperate to recoup their standing and profit margins which have been slim as of late.

I don't look at my doctor as God by any means but thanks to HPV I have precancerous cells. Do you? Wouldn't you get Gradasil or any shot before getting cancer? How did you get access to this kind of information? If you are not 100% sure, you should not scare people. If you are so sure then you should find a larger media outlet to announce this.

On 6/3/2007 Brensmom wrote:

I don't look at my doctor as God by any means but thanks to HPV I have precancerous cells. Do you? Wouldn't you get Gradasil or any shot before getting cancer? How did you get access to this kind of information? If you are not 100% sure, you should not scare people. If you are so sure then you should find a larger media outlet to announce this.

I have been researching the health implications of vaccines since '82. Having discussed the subject of vaccines w/7 doctors who I have known over the years has given me a real insight into how Pharma works. Not to mention the political arena where lobbyists often have their way due to the huge influx of $$ given to campaigns. Of these 7 doctors, NONE vaccinate their own children, nor do they recommend them to their patients. However, they are constantly under pressure to do so by the state "health" dept. which has a revolving door w/doctors/lobbyists, and their ilk.  "Women in Gov't" a Merck funded political advocacy group is paid appx. $5 million a year to do the bidding of Merck, i.e. the recent Gardasil vaccine. My own state senator said she had to pay $100 to join this advocacy group and it is strongly implied that they will be supported in their next election IF they cater to Merck.  Collusion/transparency anyone??

Thanks to pap smears and cervical screenings, cervical cancer has been reduced by 75-80%.  90% of HPV clears by itself naturally.  I have had regular pap smears since my early 20's and 19 years ago, a pap smear detected some pre-cancerous cells.  I then had cryosurgery and had a clean bill of health.  I still get regular screenings and if my OB/GYN notices anything unusual, she lets me know. 

The Gardasil vaccine only detects 4 HP viruses, two of which are genital warts.  Unfortunately here in CO, $1.5 million was recently taken out of preventative screening and treatment programs to pay for marketing Merck's gardasil vaccine thanks to pressure from the state health dept. via "Women in Gov't."  As a parent and business owner, I took time and gave testimony down at the capitol re: HPV-related bills.  It was truly amazing how many Merck lobbyists and pharma reps filled the room, day after day.  Merck's testing of this vaccine was hastily done and resulted in 17 deaths and 85 of 1200 girls having severe side effects ranging from myalgia, asthma, facial paralysis, seizures, loss of consciousness and Guillain-Barre.  Merck was warned by the federal gov't to back off pressuring legislators to mandate this bill which would have gotten them off the hook for liability reasons due to side effects and deaths which are being reported to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) via NVIC.org (Nat'l Vaccine Info Center). 

Merck wanted to be the first to put this vaccine on the market as Glaxco-Smith-Kline has their own version in the wings. Merck stands to make appx. $4-5 billion a year which will help to recoup their revenue losses thanks to Vioxx lawsuits, 27,400 which are pending, and the recent IRS judgment of $2.3 billion due to hiding profits in offshore accounts.  They are in deep shit and they feel pressure to satisfy their shareholders as their stock has declined in value significantly since the Vioxx fiasco.  Their p.r. dept. is working overtime to salvage their waning reputation.  What goes around comes around. 

So to answer your question, NO, I definitely would not subject myself or my children to this toxic vaccine which contains 675 micrograms of reactive aluminum, 1 mcg. which is considered toxic.  Not to mention the other crap that's in this vaccine, I can't imagine anyone logically considering having themselves injected w/such a neuro-toxic vaccine. It literally attacks human neuron cells as it doesn't discriminate between them and the human papilloma virus as they are basically identical in structure, according to a genetics professor.  This is why girls are experiencing such severe side effects.  Do a google search, as mentioned in my previous e-mail, on Dr. Hugh Fudenberg, re: his 10-year study on Alzheimer patients and how one increases their risk factor by 10x by having 5 consecutive flu shots, which contain aluminum and thimerosol (49.6% ethyl mercury), which are both neuro-toxins and cause cognitive dysfunction.

Vaccines do NOT confer immunity. They do compromise and weaken your immune system and the boosters that are required only add to the toxic load your body can't handle. No wonder auto-immune dis-eases are on the rise, not to mention autism, ADHD, asthma, diabetes, etc.

There was a typo in my last letter replying to your e-mail.  It's 85% of 1200 girls who have experienced severe side effects in testing.  And I have written several letters to the editor of my paper.  Unfortunately, one of the editors on the staff is heavily invested in drug co. stock, so he refuses to print any letters which are contrarian to his view.  He basically told me so when I approached him down at the capitol asking why he refused to print other letters I knew of from people whose children had experienced permanent neurological damage and death thanks to vaccine reactions, which are estimated at 1 million a year.  Corporate print and radio media is owned by pharma among other vested interests, so it's no wonder that you rarely see the other side of this issue being represented. It's not good for p.r., according to my sister-in-law who's a drug rep. 

Why would you be scared of the truth?  The drug cos. are only about fear and $$.   Remember their motto: "Womb to tomb, a customer for life."  Think about that...

Let me comment on  this both as a nurse, and a recurrent cervical cancer patient. (I missed a few paps...so have been told it is my OWN fault that I have cancer....and I have had a recurrance because I have....REALLY BAD LUCK...) The second comment actually came from one of my oncologists. Gotta love that.

I want to put my 2 cents in about this. I have had many many people asking me about this vaccine and because I am a nurse, I must be very careful what I say. I cannot say I support this even with my diagnosis. The reason for this is, I feel that it is a bandaid solution, and that not enough research on the LONG TERM effects have been done. I have told friends and family that I am not the know all simply because I have this dis-ease, but have offered my PERSONAL views, and suggested they consult with a physician they trust, and consult all of the peer reviewed research before making a decision on whether or not to vaccinate their precious ones.

I still have many questions about this "vaccine" and continue to do my own research on the subject, but I really don't like the fact that it is being crammed down my (and everyone else's) throats every time you turn on the TV or open a magazine. I have had parents tell me that they have been hounded by the school, their doctor, the school nurse, etc if they refused to have their child immunized, and been berated and told that they don't care about their child!!!. And why aren't they vaccinating the BOYS who are the ASYMPTOMATIC CARRIERS of this dis-ease...Further more, why are they not checking for this during routine physical exams??? I asked my doc about that and was told that they don't screen girls for HPV unless they have an abnormal pap??? Kind of like pulling the parachute cord after you have hit the ground, dontcha think?

Also, as a footnote, a girlfriend of mine in the UK (who, because she was REFUSED a pap smear, is fighting this dis-ease at the same stage as I am...) is in a battle with the government in the UK to screen girls PERIOD. Apparently, in the UK, girls under 25 are being refused pap smears all the time, sexually active or not, because they are felt to be "too young" to need one...