On Mar 01, 2012 1:35 PM eunicep wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012 8:42 PM Live40mr wrote:
I had 35 treatments from the Tomo machine from my ear lobes to the center of my chest. I took my treatments during my lunch hour, never missed a treatment, never missed work, lost my hair at radiation point, everything tasted bad, never had any pain medicine, dry mouth around week 4, never burned or blistered, no feeding tubes, did loose 25 lbs but needed to lol.
After treatment ceased hair gew back, taste came back 85-90 percent of salava came back, cancer did not come back :^), I am a true believer that Tomo saved my quality of life. All this was in 2005.
Mark: I know that you had the Radiation with the Toma Machine. But what type of Radiation was used. The letters IMRT stand for Intensity Modular Radiation Therapy. Both the Toma and Varain Machine can be used. Do you know how many Gy (Grey) units you had for each treatment?
Thanks for responding, these little bits of information could help someone in the Days ahead.
Sincerely, Eunice
Eunice
I know you are researching on the internet but I think you have the idea that the difference between the machines is in the type of radiation - much like there are different types of chemo drugs. The difference in the machines is the way the radiation is delivered. TOMO machines deliver radiation slice by slice RATHER than to the entire tumor area like other machines. No one questions that radiation from any machine will eradicate cancer cells - it is how precise they are in their delivery. TOMO's slice by slice allows a far more exact delivery of the radiation - and that exactness protects most of the salivary glands. We are talking about a space of milimeters between the area needing to be radiated and the salivary glands. You can see where a moving organ (as the head of radiology at Barnes Hosp stated) might benefit a little more from whole tumor radiation BUT a non-moving organ or that organ's area (such as tonsil) would benefit more from a slice by slice method of radiation. Remember, we are talking about a space measured in milimeters. IMRT works to conform the beam to the entire shape of the tumor. TOMO delivers a slice by slice beam and is so accurate that a daily CT is used to precisely place the radiation beam. The CT scan also allows the operator to modify the treatment should the patient's anatomy change because of weight loss or tumor shrinkage.
I did a little research on Varian and as Mark said, they are compaing it to IMRT which appears to be delivering radiation in much the same way. TOMO is entirely different with its slice by slice delivery. Also, I read quickly through four acticles and the articles on Varion refer to treatment for cancers such as prostate while TOMO clearly states treatment for head and neck cancers.
The fact that all machines were equal in eradicating cancer is what made it very difficult to decide on which machine to be treated with. I only wish I had someone who had personally used TOMO to tell me the difference before I had to make my decision. Thank heavens I made the right decision - but it was days of beating myself up emotionally.
You have two people on CC telling you that we had radiation via TOMO therapy and we are cancer free AND have 85-90% of our salivary glands while so many others on here had other types and deal with dry mouth due to little saliva production after treatment.
If you are trying to decide between Varian and TOMO, another point to keep in mind is that TOMO has been around since 2002 and used with high success but there is little information available on Varian because it is a relatively new type of radiation treatment (which means even less information available for head and neck cancers - and the salivary gland). Mark had his treatment in 2005 and I had mine in 2007 - we are both still cancer free, both have active salivary glands, and both are leading productive active lives today. When all is said and done, it is a decision only you can make.
Diana