On 1/4/2008
photog wrote:
As for environmental vs. genetic ... the current consensus is that it is contracted environmentally. MM has been linked to contact with toxic solvents, etc. Dr. Drury, one of the foremost experts on MM, has also attributed the recent rise in MM cases to increases in environmental toxins. I'm also holding out that with some people there is a gluten intolerance/celiac disease precursor to MM. That said ... there is probably a genetic component in terms of how easily one contracts it and how severe it is or progresses once one has it.
Regards,
Craig Persel
Good Evening Craig;
I found this article on this sites main page under IMF and Genetic Pathways:
"The study found that genetic pathways associated with the ability to neutralize environmental toxins are defective in patients with classic myeloma (myeloma with bone involvement). These pathways are identified as specific segments of genes called single nucleotide polymorphisms or SNPs that are known to be associated with toxin metabolism and DNA repair. These findings are in line with observations of patient populations and groups of workers including firefighters that had previously demonstrated a correlation between increased risk for myeloma and exposure to hydrocarbons and related chemicals."
Add another group. to the four or so, already identified for high risk in developing MM due to work place exposure.
A point I'd like to make and ask for some input on its possibility; If workers in the petroleum industry have a higher risk for developing MM, it only stands to reason that firefighters would also. They are both exposed to hydrocarbons. However, the way these people are covered in their protective gear, their exposure to the h-carbons would have to be through inhilation. To take this a step further, could the cancer's entry point be through our lungs/mucuous membranes? Also, could the exposure to the various chemicals be through inhilation of the chemicals' vapors and not actual contact with the toxins?
Concerning the first part of the article and genetic pathways. I believe this supports your hypothesis regarding a genetic component, or a defective one, that allows the cancer to flourish. However, I would like to add that short a defective DNA, could the diet of we patients encourage the proliferation of MM? Cancer, being a living organism, will only thrive in a hospitable environment. If we make our bodies less susceptible to its growth, it would either die or move on! Your comments, please.
As always, your detective work is impressive!
I hope your New Year's Resolutions are still active and ongoing.
Take care;
Kevin