On Mar 24, 2012 3:01 AM PhilA wrote:
Hi Mark,
I've fully recovered from my surgery and am moving towards chemo. I had the pathology reviewed at Johns Hopkins and was told that my tumor was 1/3 adenocarcinoma and 2/3 sarcomatoid. The latter cell type is so rare that neither Hopkins, nor my oncologist have ever heard of this cancer type in urachal tumors.
I met with an oncologist in Montreal who has seen 6 cases of urachal cancer. he recommended 4 cycles of chemo regimen: Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Gemcitabine, and Cisplatin. I am going to NEw York to see a Dr. Jonathan Rosenberg this week as Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for a consultation.
Noone has yet told me with conviction that this or another chemo regimen WILL work. It might, and I will give it a try, pending the consultation.
How are you?
Phil
Hi Phil
I wish you the best of luck and confidence. We have to live with the fact that nobody really knows Urachus cancer and that there are just to few cases and reports to get a sense what "generally" works. I will discuss the chemomix you mention with my oncologist coming monday and be happy to give you those "5 cents". In the end all of us are walking on the edge, but each a different line.
I had 3 cycles of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin, but to no avail. The combination you mention seems to be the one they are currently testing a MC Anderson in a phase II clinical trial (supposed to end February 2013). I have not yet seen any results out of that trial - so I would of course be also interested if you get infos thru your consultations.
The strategy I have with my oncolgists and second opinioned with the tumour board at the University Hospital of Zürich is to use chemo as the last option, when surgery or radiation is not possible anymore. Apart from those 3 cycles of gem/cis I will have no "pre-emptive" chemo, at least that is the view right now. This also has to do with the fact that I am strong enough - physically and mentally - to endure the operations and get back onto my legs.
Some new infos I have about the stereotactical radiation (Truebeam, 4 times 12 grey per session) I had done a meta (ca. 1.5 cm) in my right upper lung some month before which was then removed at the same time as another meta was removed in the mediastinum (between lungs) is, that the meta in the lung still showed some living cancer cells, <1%, this 3 month after stereotactical radiation. If the cancer would have been able to grow again out of that meta is not clear.
Just had another consulation today and will have a fully body CT including head this friday and then consultation about CT-results on Monday again.
I have right at the top of my head in the skin a growth about the size of a bean. Not clear yet what it is, but it may be a meta. I will have it removed and will discuss the procedure coming Monday - compared to my other operations this should be an easy walk ;-)
Keep your heads up, been doing this now since 3.5 years and I am fit, smile and enjoy my life and family.
Cheers, Mark.