Hi,
I am a nurse and was diagnosed with a "likely urachal remnant cyst". Of course that led me to do tons of research through literature reviews. Well, not too many health care professionals know much if anything about this condition. However, I did find some important things to impart. The literatures states that all urachal anomalies should be removed due to the possibility of infection and the possibilitiy of late malignant changes. What you will hear from most health professionals is "You've had it all your life, so why do anything?" Well they are wrong, for the reasons I stated. Now...who has the most experience with them? Don't know, but a way to tell is by doing a search of urachal anomalies and looking at the the authors of published papers, which you will see when you click on the "more information" I did an exhaustive research on this, and I found some very important information:
Assisted Robotic Surgery is better than traditional laproscopic surgey. The robot used is the daVinci. The reason why it is better, is because it is very precise in getting all the remnant. This is important, because you don't want any left behind to grow. More and more hospitals are using the daVinci. Go to www.intuitive surgeryinc.com. There will be a hospital locator tab. Another important piece of information. Dr. Robert Nagourney is a hemo-oncologist and has a lab for determining the best chemotherapeutic regeimes for patient specifi cancers. He is a world renowned scientist. He is at rational therapeutics.com
I have chosen to go to the Lahey Clinic Medical Center in Mass. Dr Ingolf Tuerk is a world renowned urology surgeon and he has experience with urachal cancer, and he uses the daVinci in some cases. I hope I have given you valuable information here. Urachal anomalies are rare- 1 in 8,000. They can be benign. But all have to come out,( confirmed by Dr. Tuerk). Wish me luck. I wish you the best.
authord