newly diagnosed at 35yo with radical hysterectomy

3 Posts | Page(s): 1 

newly diagnosed at 35yo with radical hysterectomy

by Tink1021 on Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Quote | Reply
Hi all...I'm grateful for this board.  I had cryo 10 years ago because of abnormal pap.  I then had 2 children.  Now I had a pap on June 21 and was referred to a gyne/onc for a colposcopy and biopsy.  She did that and said that due to the results "moderately invasive carcinoma" I should have a radical hysterectomy with removal of lymph nodes and "probably" no addition treatment.  My questions are this:  Has anyone ever heard of the hysterectomy with lymph node removal in a case like this?  Does anyone know any GREAT gyn/onc in the Chicago area?  Does anyone know of any holistic help that I can start on?  I will have the surgery anyway...but I am just not certain about the lymph removal or is this just standard practice?  I have a call into the dr. and the clinic, but seems really agressive (maybe it should be?)  I am 35 yo and don't care about the removal of the uterus...I am keeping my ovaries. 

RE: newly diagnosed at 35yo with radical hysterectomy

by LindaTillamook on Sat Aug 16, 2008 12:00 AM

Quote | Reply
I have recently been diagnosed with cervical cancer stage 1b1 and the recommended treatment for that is radical hysterectomy with lymph node dissection.  I am meeting with the gyn-oncologist in 3 weeks to determine if I am in good enough shape for the surgery ..... I am overweight, unfortunately.  If the surgeon determines that I haven't lost enough weight, I'll receive internal/external radiation instead.  It has been presented to me that they have equally good results for my stage, but I am opting for surgery if possible.

RE: newly diagnosed at 35yo with radical hysterectomy

by Ltk7321 on Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:00 AM

Quote | Reply

I was diagnosed at 34 with stage 1b1 adenocarcinoma and the first oncologist recommended a radical hysterectomy with lymph node removal.  I did go to a second oncologist and found that I was a candidate for a trachelectomy with lymph node removal.  Basically, the difference is that with a trach, your cervix is removed but you retain your uterus so that you can still have children.  I had my surgery almost a year and a half ago.  I would strongly encourage everyone to always seek a second opinion.  As far as is a hysterectomy standard for "invasive cancer"..I think it depends on what stage you are diagnosed with.  However, all the research I have done does steer one towards a hysterectomy, or lately, a trach.

 

Good luck and take care!

3 Posts | Page(s): 1 
Subscribe to this message board discussion

Latest Messages

CancerCompass Poll

Do you ever feel like you need to advice about frustrations or touchy situations related to cancer?

We care about your feedback. Let us know how we can improve your CancerCompass experience.