<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>newly diagnosed at 35yo with radical hysterectomy </title>
    <description>Latest messages for CancerCompass discussion</description>
    <link>http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,26189,0.htm</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>RSS.NET: http://www.rssdotnet.com/</generator>
    <item>
      <title>RE: newly diagnosed at 35yo with radical hysterectomy</title>
      <description>I was diagnosed at 34 with stage 1b1 adenocarcinoma and the first oncologist recommended a radical hysterectomy with lymph node removal.&amp;nbsp; I did go to a second oncologist and found that I was a candidate for a trachelectomy with lymph node removal.&amp;nbsp; Basically, the difference is that with a trach, your cervix is removed but you retain your uterus so that you can still have children.&amp;nbsp; I had my surgery almost a year and a half ago.&amp;nbsp; I would strongly encourage everyone to always seek a second opinion.&amp;nbsp; As far as is a hysterectomy standard for &amp;quot;invasive cancer&amp;quot;..I think it depends on what stage you are diagnosed with.&amp;nbsp; However, all the research I have done does steer one towards a hysterectomy, or lately, a trach.&amp;nbsp;Good luck and take care!</description>
      <author>Ltk7321</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: newly diagnosed at 35yo with radical hysterectomy</title>
      <description>I have recently been diagnosed with cervical cancer stage 1b1 and the recommended treatment for that is radical hysterectomy with lymph node dissection.&amp;nbsp; I am meeting with the gyn-oncologist in 3 weeks to determine if I am in good enough shape for the surgery ..... I am overweight, unfortunately.&amp;nbsp; If the surgeon determines that I haven&amp;#39;t lost enough weight, I&amp;#39;ll receive internal/external radiation instead.&amp;nbsp; It has been presented to me that they have equally good results for my stage, but I am opting for surgery if possible.</description>
      <author>LindaTillamook</author>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>newly diagnosed at 35yo with radical hysterectomy </title>
      <description>Hi all...I&amp;#39;m grateful for this board.&amp;nbsp; I had cryo 10 years ago because of abnormal pap.&amp;nbsp; I then had 2 children.&amp;nbsp; Now I had a pap on June 21 and was referred to a gyne/onc for a colposcopy and biopsy.&amp;nbsp; She did that and said that due to the results &amp;quot;moderately invasive carcinoma&amp;quot; I should have a radical hysterectomy with removal of lymph nodes and &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; no addition treatment.&amp;nbsp; My questions are this:&amp;nbsp; Has anyone ever heard of the hysterectomy with lymph node removal in a case like this?&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know any GREAT gyn/onc in the Chicago area?&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know of any holistic help that I can start on?&amp;nbsp; I will have the surgery anyway...but I am just not certain about the lymph removal or is this just standard practice?&amp;nbsp; I have a call into the dr. and the clinic, but seems really agressive (maybe it should be?)&amp;nbsp; I am 35 yo and don&amp;#39;t care about the removal of the uterus...I am keeping my ovaries.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <author>Tink1021</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>