<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Laproscopic vs standard surgery</title>
    <description>Latest messages for CancerCompass discussion</description>
    <link>http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,31742,0.htm</link>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>RSS.NET: http://www.rssdotnet.com/</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Laproscopic vs standard surgery</title>
      <description>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Hi:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; You know sometimes I&amp;#39;m skeptical about the fact that the majority&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; of thoracic surgeons do push the standard procedures of doing an&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; IV operation while shying away from the laproscopic method.The&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; question in my mind is&amp;nbsp;; are they doing this because they&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; don&amp;#39;t have the proper training &amp;amp; experience in laproscopic or are&amp;nbsp; the current standard methods truly superior? They claim that&amp;nbsp;they have a better chance of removing all of the cancer with the&amp;nbsp;standard methods than they do through the laproscopic method.&amp;nbsp;What can they see when they open someone up that they can&amp;#39;t&amp;nbsp;see through a pet scan? Additionally, if a pet scan can not detecta cancerous spot that is smaller than a dime, what is the surgeonlikely to see with his/her human eyesight? I can see the necessityof the standard procedure if the scans detect a metastic situationto other organs but suppose it&amp;#39;s only a one or a few lymph nodes?Why cant this be done on a minimally invasive basis?&amp;nbsp;This whole approach by the medical community in general when&amp;nbsp;it does come down to esophageal surgery does provide a needto have some additional clarification &amp;amp; insight for patients.Are we being denied certain options because of the lack ofskill and training on the part of the doctors? I inquired abouthaving laproscopic surgery done by a certain doctor on a 3cm--1 lymph node situation--his response was----&amp;quot;naahh! I want to get&amp;nbsp;in there and see what&amp;#39;s going on&amp;quot;.What the hell is that supposed&amp;nbsp;to mean? I&amp;#39;m supposed to accept that? These people aren&amp;#39;t gods.&amp;nbsp;They make many errors-particularly when it comes to prognosis.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m reading more &amp;amp; more about docs who are performing&amp;nbsp;sucessful lapro surgeries for esophageal cancer.Is this all&amp;nbsp;baloney or is it that it&amp;#39;s easier for the docs to do the standard&amp;nbsp;operational procedure rather than to go out there and get the&amp;nbsp;additional training?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Any opinions?--------Bob S.</description>
      <author>Bob_S</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>