I'm glad you're doing this. But are you going to discuss the therapeutic medication proving successsful in clinical trials? Nventa has HspE7, CNRS has MVA E2, Roche has the vaccine TG-4001, which has therpeutic properties to clear up dysplasia caused by HPV-16. There are also clinical trials being conducted with other medications, by insitutions such as UCSF or the John Hopkins Medical Institute,
Although it's good to let women know how important it is to have regular exams, you would do women a greater good by letting them know these medications are around, right now. I have been in contact with some of the above-mentioned organizations. One of them said it's very hard to convince people who support LEEP, in particular, that therapeutic medication is necessary. Why? I did research about who was producing and distributing the surgical tools to remove dypslasia, and there were some heavy-hitting corporations, making quite a profit.
In addition, there are a lot of doctors making a lot of money from these surgeries. It's not in their financial best interest for medication to replace surgery, as the first course of action. When I was addressing dysplasia and asked my first ex-doctor and then my second ex-doctor about medication, they either weren't keeping up with their professions or they lied because they wanted to make money from LEEP. But I did not know that Nventa was open for candidates to test HspE7 in clinical trials.
By making the public aware of therapeutic medication, we could have access to it faster. My gripe with gynecology is that it is currently a stagnant profession. It took a big step forward with the development of the PAP smear and other screening methods. But the treatment is still invasive and barbaric, the success rate is still the same, and the recurrence rate is still the same. People like you could help change this.