Until recently, reading the posts on this site, I didn't realize that a parietal tumour location was frequently seen as inoperable. My husband's GBM is in the right parietal, and the surgeon did not seem reluctant at all. He did tell us that there was a great chance of loss of function of the left side of his body, and I know that was a consideration in the decision, but my husband said, "you get that thing out of my head, and I'll deal with the left sided weakness". That was his take on the problem. I don't know if he really expected to wake up completely paralyzed on the whole left side, but that is what happened. The surgeon was so apologetic, but within days, he was wiggling toes, fingers, then moving the arm and leg, and in a couple of weeks he was starting to walk with the therapists. He will not allow anyone to talk about prognosis in his presence, and he will not accept that his disability is not improveable. He made remarkable progress in getting back to mobility and self care, in the month of post op rehab, but he has lasting deficits that no amount of therapy will correct. He needs help with a lot of daily activities. but he is alive. He would do it again. He is getting back this week, to another course of rehabilitaion. It's been 2 years on May 1st, since his surgery. MRI's have been clear. Another is coming a week from tomorrow. Life in 3 month increments.
This is my question. How many of the readers on this site have the parietal tumour, how many were refused surgery, and if surgery has been done, what are your deficits? If you lost the use of your one side, does that mean you would not do it again? When the tumour is on the left of the head, there is also communication losses to go along with the right sided weakness. That has to be harder to deal with.
Donna L [surprised]