I was diagnosed with prostate cancer, 8.5 PSA and Geason 3+4
I have a friend who told me about ultrasound for prostate cancer. I feel very lucky to have been told about this as doctors won't tell you and so I want to tell others. Although my G.P. told me that I was doing the right thing in pursuing HIFU.
It costs $25,000. and worth every penny, it's called HIFU, for High Intensified Focused Ultrasound, there are too many restrictions on the trials. HIFU has been in use in Europe for 18 years, and is in use in virtually every other developed country in the world, except the USA.
It's in clinical trials here in the USA, call 888-874-4384 to find a trail near you (it's free!). But I left the country, I went to Mexico and had it done. It was pain free, I had no complications or side-effects from it, no recovery time. The hospital was perfect and the people very nice. My doctor is American, lives in S. Carolina and he has been traveling to Puerto Vallarta and Nassau once a week to treat men for 6 years. He brings his own team, they all wore uniforms that said International HIFU on them. He brings a nurse, a anethisologist, and mechanic to monitor the machine. I had to get pre-op clearance from my G.P. at home, plus a complete blood panel. I sent him all my tests from the biopsy, etc. The procedure took 2 hours, then I had to wait for the sleeping potion to wear off, then the nurse drove me back to the hotel. I had a supra-pubic catheter in and had it removed after 12 days, it is in to prevent urethral strictures (a clog in the penis), to let the prostate pieces pass--they are little pieces of cooked prostate.
I found a girl whose husband had it done 8 years ago, his PSA has been 0.1 for years, he's sent in several friends and they all report the same as me, it's amazing! You will always have a gland, just no tissue in it, so the goal is low and stable PSA.
The latest trial from the UK still has 1 in 172 men with incontinence, those are my kinda results! I've sent in a few friends and they all report no side effects.
When I think about ultrasound and radiation, I think they both are the same technology--they target the gland, only radiation did not have to go through clinical trials, and it has so many adverse side-effects. Ultrasound doesn't harm surrounding tissue as it is non-ionizing.
good luck in whatever you chose!