I am so confused right now, and I am hoping someone on here can help clear up a few things. My husband (age 51) was just diagnosed with prostate cancer. His psa is 4.5, free psa of 8%. He hated the urologist he saw--the guy was a total jerk, and no personable bedside manner at all. Our family doctor refused to give us a referral to another doctor (a story for another day...but he was a total idiot, too..there's a lot of jerks practicing medicine in Maryland, apparently) Long story short, in order to avoid (or put off as long as possible) a biopsy, he went to a center that does the mri-spectroscopy study and ultrasound. The study came back with evidence of prostatitis, BPH, and organ-confined prostate cancer (the cancer was found using the creatine, choline, citrate ratios..)and it has not escaped the prostate. According to the doctor and the radiologist, the cancer is very, very small and we could do the "watchful monitoring" safely for up to a year.
At the time of the mri-s and ultrasound done by this center, neither of us realized that the doctor we went to for the mri-s study and ultrasound only does the HIFU procedure out of the country. When we found out the cost, we know we simply cannot afford that amount of money. I wish we could, because it sounds like a very good treatment. We already checked, and our insurance will not cover one penny of this because it is still considered experimental here in the US. Our problem is now, we cannot find anyone else willing to see us without a biopsy--even to enroll in the clinical trials, you need biopsy results. They say it is to obtain a gleason score--is that scoring really necessary if we know that the cancer has not escaped the prostate? It bugs me that to enter a trial for a non-invasive procedure to treat prostate cancer, you have to undergo an invasive procedure (the biopsy) to diagnose it. Makes no sense...
Does anyone know of any place that will accept the mri-s results without a biopsy? If he has a biopsy done (I am thinking that is the only option, now), do we actually get a copy of the written pathology report that we can take to another doctor? Or do the pathology reports stay with the doctor who did the biopsy? Are they required to release the results to the patient?
Please understand that this is all new to us, we only got the diagnosis 4 days ago. I have been doing constant reading and research, but we are stuck at a point where I think he will have to have a biopsy, which he just absolutely dreads. Anyone who has had an mri-s study without a biopsy or any advice about our next step, please reply. I appreciate your input. Please, if you can refrain, do not make comments about "sucking it up" or being a man regarding the biopsy--I am sure deep down, many of you can relate to the fear and we need encouragement right now, not sarcastic comments. Our own doctors so far have given us enough of those, and this is very discouraging.