Hi Ashlea, hope you are feeling OK and handling chemo, hard to do, I'm sure.
My experience, as I said earlier, was breast angiosarcoma caused by radiation I received in 1994 for a different breast cancer.
My oncologist at Nevada Cancer Institute did not feel chemo was appropriate for me at this time. I had a mastectomy on 5/1/2008 and a subsequent CT/PET fusion scan did not indicate any gross metasteses. Therefore, my surgeon and oncologist feel that AT THIS TIME, careful monitoring is indicated but they found no basis for chemo now. I would add that this was the second oncology opinion I received. The first opinion was that I should start doxorurubicin at once but my surgeon strongly disagreed with that recommendation. I may have chemo in the event I have a recurrence of this beast but at the moment, no chemo. I will be having regular CT/PET scans and whatever other monitoring tests they feel are necessary.
I'm sorry but I'm not sure what taxol is. If it's similar to or related to tamoxifen, I had a course of that following my 1994 cancer.
It's true that the doctors don't see many cases of this, that is also the case in the states. My own primary care physician admitted that he'd never heard of such a thing which is why he referred me to the leading-edge breast care specialist in nearby Las Vegas. It is very difficult (from my standpoint) to obtain information on this monster but it is because there are so few of us, I guess not enough to provide a good statistical base. I fear that this could become a pandemic, given how many women were treated with lumpectomy/radiation for breast cancer during the past .
I wish you the very best outcome, please post and keep us informed of your progress. I am curious as to why it was necessary to do follow-up surgery after your mastectomy. Was this a recurrence or?
Hang in there!
Dianne