On 1/22/2007
Amy g. wrote:
On 1/17/2007 Ikenkris wrote:
Hi there! Is anyone out there?? I noticed there hasn't been any posts in a long time. I started this discussion way back when. I've been following your emails and was wondering about Meredith. I posted about my sister on several different "small cell" posts throughout the "gyn" and "cervical" cancer message boards. My sister got diagnosed with SCCC in Feb 06 and fought it with chemo and radiation until Aug 06. She had clean scans in Oct 06 and just had her 2nd round of scans Jan 07. They noticed two slightly larger than normal lymph nodes in the pelvic region on the scans and are sending her for a PET scan next monday. We are terrified. They said it could just be inflammation? Anyone else experience this type of scare? Thanks. Kristina
My 34 year old sister was diagnosed with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma on November 10, 2006. She had 2 rounds of chemo consisting of: Cisplatin on day 1 and Etopside on days 1-3. We found out last week through a PET scan that her tumor grew from 4 cm to 10 cm and it has metastized on the side of her face and the cancer is in her lymph nodes. Needless to say, we were devastated. Today, 1-22-07, she started Topotecan, which she will have every day for 1 week with 2 weeks off. Before round 2 they will do another PET scan to see where things are. The goal is to shrink the tumor enough to do a total hysterectomy. Right now her tumor is too close to her bladder. Keep me posted on how the PET scan turned out. Thanks-Amy
Hi my name is Lisa and I am from the UK I was diagnosed on 31st January 2006. I was told I had stage 1b1 and no evedence of any spread.The tumour wasn't in my lymph or blood. I had 2 rounds of caboplatan and etoposide followed by radical hysterectomy then another 4 doses of chemotherapy followed by 5 weeks of external radiotherapy then 2 internal treatments. My first CT scan on 20th November was completely clear.However I have been given two completely different prognoses by consultants.My surgical oncologist told me it would probably come back and that I should take medical retirement and my clinical oncologist said no way how due you expect to pay for your old age if you don't go back to work, he said that this type of cancer used to have a really bad prognoses but that was no longer the case and now days with the advance in medical treatments the majority of patients survive. I am now seeking a second opinion through my insurance company. I Know there are certain factors associated with a good prognoses with this type of cancer but I am not sure where I fit in with this.So far I have found out that in order to fit the bill the following apply.
1.your tumour must be less than 2cm at hysterectomy
2.It must not be in your blood or lymph
3 You must be a non smoker
4 You must not have any other serious illness such as HIV or chrons
5 You must not be an alchoholic or drug addict
6 your tumour must be within surgical margins( I am not entirely sure what this means, I think it means that the tumour must not be at the edge of your cervix as it is more likely to have spread to other organs.
7 You need to be treated with either cisplatin or caboplatin and etoposide as opposed to other chemo.(not sure if this is now the case as based on report written in the 1990,s which gave a 70% survival compared with 35% for other chemo regimes but ther are probably newer treatments out there now.
I do know that people survive this type of cancer as I read a report based in Scotland that followed 15 patients each of them for 10 years at the end of this period there were 7 survivors one of which was diagnosed in her 80's and is now in her 90's. What I haven't managed to work out, is if you fit the bill on all these prognoses factors is if there is a 100% survival rate.In my case I do not know about my surgical margins, I do not know if the surgeon based his prognoses on this or if the clinical oncologist has looked at all these factors and that is why he seems so positive that is why I have asked for a second opnion. The other thing to bear in mind is that even people given a poor prognoses survive my doctor said one of her patients was given 2 weeks to live over 10 years ago and that consultants get it wrong all the time.