Hi Joann
The nanoknife was becuase the whipple was not an option.
We went to StonyBrook on Long Island Sound but were also preparing to go to Dr. Martin in KY. Ours was in May along with at least three other people on this site at the same time. The irony is that we just found out that the whipple is now an option. Trust me, it's a long three year story. We had a "failed whipple" in 08 .so my advice to anyone would be don't always believe if it's "inoperable" that it's always that way. We don't know why no-one caught the change we were just told , after asking what happened, "that once inoperable always inoperable". We liked this doctor so we're not sure where we go from here. We keep in touch with Hopkins and Farber and the question came up as to wether we will be doing the whipple again. Don't know.
Never give up hope!!!!!!! The whipple option is now available but we would still have done the Nanoknife!!!!! The window for the Nanoknife is small and it was (we thought) our best option. When making the nanoknife decision we asked our doctor if we could have the whipple would he recommend it and he said yes. Something has to change in this type of cancer and my husband was willing to be one who helps. I don't know your circumstances but we have always been told that the whipple is the way to go.
I hope I have not confused you. Right now we are at the hospital getting a scan to see what's up so we will have more info by Friday.
Good luck!
Pat