Overall increase is small, though, adding 1 cancer per 1,000 women treated
by Tigress on Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:00 AM
by Oncrx on Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:00 AM
by Tigress on Mon Jul 17, 2006 12:00 AM
by Dee000 on Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:00 AM
by Donald_S_2 on Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:00 AM
I was just diagnosed with the same thing and have been told by many doctors that the only safe treatment is total hysterectomy as you have been told.
They said much younger women who may still want to bear children may be treated with hormones and that occasionally the tissue converts back but the risk at our age is far too great.
I lost my husband to lung cancer 4 yrs ago and have an 11 yr. old daughter that I love dearly. I am not permenioausal yet and am turning 50 in a few weeks. It is totally bumming me out to have to go through this surgery but do not want to leave my daughter an orphan.
Just thought you might like to hear from someone else going through the same thing.
The best of luck to you.
When you track a discussion, you will get notified by e-mail if anyone else posts a new message on this discussion. Are you sure you want to track this discussion?
If you stop tracking this discussion, you will no longer get notified by e-mail if anyone else posts a new message on this discussion. Are you sure you want to stop tracking this discussion?
If you were considering traveling for cancer treatment, which headline would you find more interesting?
Destination: HOPE. Cancer care that is worth the trip.
Over 84% of our patients travel to our hospital from another state
Neither headline is interesting
We care about your feedback. Let us know how we can improve your CancerCompass experience.