The Beast is Back

23 Posts | Page(s): 1 2 3  Next 

The Beast is Back

by future2020 on Sat Jul 14, 2012 09:11 PM

Quote | Reply

After 16 months of Avastin, and basically symptom free living, the Beast is back, thus Avastin no longer working. Round three begins (round one surgery/Temodar/radiation, round two Avastin). We find out more on Tuesday, July 17th, but husband has been offered inclusion in NIH clinical trial     http://clinicalstudies.info.nih.gov/cgi/detail.cgi?A_2011-C-

This is a highly experimental gene transfer study that takes the patient’s own white blood cells, adds a retrovirus to them, grows the new cells in a lab for a month, then infuses them (the genetically altered cells) back into the patient. One doctor called it a ‘smart bomb’ against GBM tumors that targets and kills the GBM cells – if it works. 

RE: The Beast is Back

by HubbyhasGBM on Sat Jul 14, 2012 09:30 PM

Quote | Reply

I'm so sorry to hear that it's back.  We just got news of the same fate last Wednesday.  I hope the new plan works for you.

RE: The Beast is Back

by siblingof on Sun Jul 15, 2012 02:14 AM

Quote | Reply
Hi Future, sorry to hear you're at second recurrence. So are we. My first thought on looking at that study is "Well, we wouldn't do that because my sister's tumor doesn't express EGFR." So... does your husband's tumor? If you don't know then a FISH analysis would tell you, I think... Good luck.

RE: The Beast is Back

by future2020 on Sun Jul 15, 2012 02:28 AM

Quote | Reply

Hi Siblingof, yes his tumor does express the EGFR; I guess they knew because of the initial tumor removal and ran tests on it? I had never heard of this marker (or whatever it is) until NIH told us about it. It sounds solid, and what if it works? than other tumors that express other markers would be eligible for target and destroy from a patient’s own white blood cells. The science sounds solid to me. but the risks that are involved... My husband wants to so this, and I will stand by his decision.

RE: The Beast is Back

by Johnr_1 on Sun Jul 15, 2012 02:42 AM

Quote | Reply

On Jul 15, 2012 2:28 AM future2020 wrote:

Hi Siblingof, yes his tumor does express the EGFR; I guess they knew because of the initial tumor removal and ran tests on it? I had never heard of this marker (or whatever it is) until NIH told us about it. It sounds solid, and what if it works? than other tumors that express other markers would be eligible for target and destroy from a patient’s own white blood cells. The science sounds solid to me. but the risks that are involved... My husband wants to so this, and I will stand by his decision.

I read the Clinical Trial details and it sounds solid. Some Clinical Trials do what's called a Double Blind Study, meaning only 1/3 of the patients get the real drug treatment, the others get a Placebo (Water or something fake). You might ask about that here.

This sounds like every patient involved gets all the new treatment. That's really good news.

My Best

John

http://liveforeverwithcancer.com/

RE: The Beast is Back

by siblingof on Sun Jul 15, 2012 01:16 PM

Quote | Reply
Future, yes, the science seems solid to me as well. EGFR stands for epidermal growth factor receptor... and yeah, they would've found that out from an analysis of the original tumor. So yeah, I think this seems like a good route to be pursuing.

RE: The Beast is Back

by Bulley1 on Mon Jul 16, 2012 02:35 AM

Quote | Reply

Please keep us posted.  Best wishes the trial adds much time and he can continue to enjoy "symptom free living".

Pam

RE: The Beast is Back

by future2020 on Wed Jul 18, 2012 05:56 PM

Quote | Reply

Hi

 Husband is scheduled for Apheresis (to have the white blood cells separated out) at NIH in Bethesda, on July 26, 2012. Supposed to take up to five hours to get these cells. Spoke in-depth with the researchers yesterday; apparently this method has worked wonderfully with melanoma. Husband is gung-ho and so am I!

RE: The Beast is Back

by Luvingwife on Thu Jul 19, 2012 05:00 PM

Quote | Reply

Future2020

My husband has been on Tarceva for several years. It is an EGFR inhibitor  that is used to treat Pancreatic and Non small cell lung cancer.   When he had his surgery in 2004, there was not a test done to see if his tumor expressed the EGFR.  But his neuro oncologist believes that the Tarceva is likely the reason hubby has done so well.   The first couple of years insurance did not cover it and the Tarceva was provided at no cost by the pharma company.  Now his insurance coveres it, but still very pricey copay.

Good luck

http://www.tarceva.com/patient/considering/about.jsp

Laurie V

RE: The Beast is Back

by csdiver on Thu Jul 19, 2012 05:27 PM

Quote | Reply

On Jul 18, 2012 5:56 PM future2020 wrote:

Hi

 Husband is scheduled for Apheresis (to have the white blood cells separated out) at NIH in Bethesda, on July 26, 2012. Supposed to take up to five hours to get these cells. Spoke in-depth with the researchers yesterday; apparently this method has worked wonderfully with melanoma. Husband is gung-ho and so am I!

I had this done for the ICT trail, the blood taking part is not bad. Just bring a book :)

23 Posts | Page(s): 1 2 3  Next 
Subscribe to this message board discussion

Latest Messages

View More

CancerCompass Poll

Did you or your loved one seek a second opinion before starting cancer treatment?

Gateway for Cancer Research
CNCA Health

We care about your feedback. Let us know how we can improve your CancerCompass experience.