On Oct 30, 2012 4:29 AM vwxyz wrote:
i agree with you. People do so much better "without" hearing time expectencies. They actually LIVE their lives and overcome medicine side effects better. They give themselves chance to LIVE and be greatful to God.
I wonder why they encourage standard treatment all at once after the operation instead of saving temodar or other chemo etc for when it starts to grow back the 2nd time and radiation for when it comes back the 3rd time?
I would think the combo of standard treatment all at once can weaken the immune system, body, and shorten the life span before it grows back. I would think stretching treatment out over the years can add quality to life,as well. Just a speculation.
I couldn't disagree more (as an actual patient with a GBM). If my caregiver had lied to me about my disease I'd be really angry.
It's only by knowing the severity that I was able to muster the strength to fight and endure the nausea and vomiting from chemo. It also gave me the push to research molecular biology and be able to discuss treatment options with my NO.
To me it would be like the intelligence community lying to an army general about to go into battle about enemy numbers to make them feel better. How on earth can you plan a battle without knowing what you're up against. It certainly didn't hurt in the Battle of Thermopylae knowing how many troops Xerses had.
That being said - no-one should be diagnosed with cancer without being referred to this article : http://www.cancerguide.org/median_not_msg.html
I say to my GBM - Mολ?ν λαβ?