Average Rating:Rating
Rate this Discussion: rate!

Possible Mets To Lungs After Rectal Cancer

Expand all Messages
Subject: RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
Date: 11/25/2007

Hi Ruth:

Your situation is common but being that it's your situation, it's VERY critical to you. I always advise a 2nd opinion because all docs are not equal. My choice is CTCA (Cancer Treatment Centers of America) because they have the most advanced technoogy on any cancer. They treat you as a real person - wih no strings attached. Cancer patients have a great reluctance to travel for some reason and most elect to stay with the doc they started with. This is all too often not a good decision. My wife (and I) traveled and got the best care available - far from home but with miraculous results.

It is true that while the lung nodules are tiny (less than 3 mm), they are not life threatening - but treat them now while they are vulnerable, small, and non-aggressive. Xeloda is a good choice for this (an oral chemo that you take at home). It will also attack any other 'live' cancer cells in your body.

Moving to standard chemo, absolutely get a port installed. It is effcient, unnoticed, and can stay in for years without side effects. It saves your veins and unnecessary needle pricks. At CTCA, the port installation procedure is 45 minutes and can be scheduled within hours of your arrival.

The docs there are caring, available, friendly, and extremely experienced at treating all types of cancer at all stages. At no cost to you, it is an option you must consider. 800-FOR-HELP

Caregiver Dave  

Messages History for "Possible Mets To Lungs After Rectal Cancer"

  1. possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  2. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  3. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  4. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  5. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  6. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  7. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  8. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  9. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  10. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  11. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  12. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
  13. RE: possible mets to lungs after rectal cancer
Expand all Messages
close




Sending...
Required Fields All fields are required.
close
User is No longer Ignored
Show messages from this user
close
Report Abuse
Anonymous Note to Administrator:

Reporting
Latest Messages Show More
RE: reoccurance?? Posted by micromisterphone on 01/09 07:16:53 PM
RE: Severe acne 1 wk post Posted by trehouse60 on 01/09 07:09:07 PM
RE: Hydration during chem Posted by jodysboys on 01/09 07:03:00 PM
Nutrition issues and naus Posted by vapj59 on 01/09 06:57:38 PM
RE: RAD-001 Posted by Ambush on 01/09 06:52:01 PM
RE: Lump in throat Posted by Cavwife on 01/09 06:33:59 PM
RE: 2 year post-op proble Posted by petewv on 01/09 06:33:38 PM
Questions about lung mets Posted by spiffster on 01/09 06:30:44 PM
RE: Levulan Posted by DebR22 on 01/09 06:24:18 PM
RE: Leiomysarcoma Posted by andy123 on 01/09 06:23:28 PM
RE: patrick swayze Posted by chef4u on 01/09 05:58:36 PM
Colon Cancer - 3D Medical Animation