<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CancerCompass Message Board: PET SCAN Resulst</title>
    <description>CancerCompass message board discussion started by Tl1230 on 3/2/2007</description>
    <link>http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,10063,0.htm</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>RSS.NET: http://www.rssdotnet.com/</generator>
    <item>
      <title>PET SCAN Resulst</title>
      <description>I was diagnosed with non cell lung cancer Stage IA in Nov 2006. Before my surgery I had a PET scan. it showed a hot spot in in my LT pelvic region. Because I just had bladder surgery (bladder lift) I did not follow up on the pelvic hot spot. Now 3 months after my surgery I had another PET scan that showed uptake again in my left pelvic region. I had a ultrasound that was basically negative (small fibroid).&amp;nbsp; Now they want me to have an MRI.&amp;nbsp; Has anyone heard of false positive PET scans??&amp;nbsp; This is all making me nervous.</description>
      <author>Tl1230</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: PET SCAN Resulst</title>
      <description>mmm?Have you had a colonoscopy before? Hypermetabolic polyps will show in the pelvic region..just a thought, without seeing the scan or report it is hard to tell.&amp;nbsp; MRI is a very good imaging modality for soft tissue structures. It certainly wouldn&amp;#39;t hurt.&amp;nbsp; If its negative, I would think about colonoscopy if you haven&amp;#39;t had one.&amp;nbsp; Kim&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <author>Kimbersue</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: PET SCAN Resulst</title>
      <description>hi! u seem quite knowledgeable: i wrote u a private message but since i had no answer, maybe u didnt get it: is it possible to read a ctscan without the contrast liquid? i have some kidney problems since my chemo finished 7 months ago &amp;amp; my onc said i shouldnt have the contrast: is this feasible? also, he claims that a pet scan isnt used for ovarian cancer, or does he mean that since i am in remission, it wouldnt show anything?would appreciate&amp;nbsp; hearing from u, harriet</description>
      <author>Harrietg.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>