<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CancerCompass Message Board: June 2007 monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"</title>
    <description>CancerCompass message board discussion started by Melanomavitamindguy on 6/19/2007</description>
    <link>http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,13601,0.htm</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>RSS.NET: http://www.rssdotnet.com/</generator>
    <item>
      <title>June 2007 monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"</title>
      <description>TO: All melanoma researchers, doctors, and patients.The conception of melanoma as a vitamin D deficiency cancer sheds light on a number of pieces to the puzzle.  To start, we can now see why melanoma arises in nevi disproportionately more than de novo--in new skin.The greater pigmentation absorbs more sunlight and less penetrating light means less blood flow in that lesion, thus leaving it prone to developing melanoma whenever circulating vitamin D (25D) is depleted.How fitting, then, that a nevus is commonly called a mole, as the term likewise refers to one who works in the dark.James SemmelAlbuquerque, New Mexico</description>
      <author>Melanomavitamindguy</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: June 2007 monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"</title>
      <description>Does this http://www.cancercompass.com/cancer-news/1,13112,00.htm?c=10 :5:1:2&amp;nbsp;contradict some of your previous analysis regarding breast and colon cancer not being Vitamin D cancers but melanoma would be?-g</description>
      <author>Drcpas</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>