<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CancerCompass Message Board: Myeloma Survival Benefit With Lower Dose of Steroids</title>
    <description>CancerCompass message board discussion started by photog on 12/10/2007</description>
    <link>http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,18754,0.htm</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>RSS.NET: http://www.rssdotnet.com/</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Myeloma Survival Benefit With Lower Dose of Steroids</title>
      <description>I thought this new information was very important ...&amp;nbsp;
Results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase III clinical trial
E4A03, for multiple myeloma, showing significantly better overall
survival with lenalidomide (revlimid) plus low-dose dexamethasone therapy compared
to lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone.Full article:http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-12/mc-mmc120607. Regards,Craig Persel&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <author>photog</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Myeloma Survival Benefit With Lower Dose of Steroids</title>
      <description>How many mg&amp;#39;s (of say Decadron) per week or month would be considered high vs. low dose?</description>
      <author>Texas43</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Myeloma Survival Benefit With Lower Dose of Steroids</title>
      <description>Good question. I had the same, but it was not included in the short article. I will try and track down more information and pass it along.To use my own wife as an example ... when she started on Thal/Dex she was being given 40mg of Dex. Now she is on Velcade and receiving 20mg. I&amp;#39;m not sure if this constitutes high vs. low, but there definitely is a difference in side effects.I&amp;#39;ll see what details I can find about this study.Regards,Craig&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <author>photog</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Myeloma Survival Benefit With Lower Dose of Steroids</title>
      <description>Got it ...&amp;quot;Patients in the high-dex group received Dex 40 mg days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 PO every 28 days. Patients in the low-dex group received Dex 40 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 PO every 28 days.&amp;quot; So ... both groups received 40mg of Dex, but the high-dex group it 12 out of 28 days whereas the low-dex group received it only 4 out of 28 days.&amp;nbsp;Very useful information, in my opinion, for future treatment of myeloma using Rev/Dex. Regards,Craig Persel&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <author>photog</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Myeloma Survival Benefit With Lower Dose of Steroids</title>
      <description>Thanks.&amp;nbsp; This is helpful.&amp;nbsp; I have been on Revlimid for a little over 1 yr. along with 35 mg (for most of the time)&amp;nbsp;of decadron per week.&amp;nbsp; I guess this puts me at a slightly lower dose than the &amp;quot;low dose.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; Response has been great -&amp;nbsp;steady&amp;nbsp;improvement in test results and now in complete&amp;nbsp;remission.&amp;nbsp;For&amp;nbsp;now, we are&amp;nbsp;continuing the Revlimid, but gradually reducing/removing the steroids to see what happens.</description>
      <author>Texas43</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Myeloma Survival Benefit With Lower Dose of Steroids</title>
      <description>I&amp;#39;ve been on Revlimid for 17 months now without dex. and have had excellent results for the entire time.&amp;nbsp; I started on 50mg, dropped to 25 in the second month and went down to 10mg from the third month.&amp;nbsp; So only 10mg of Revlimid has kept my paraprotein down from 90 to 7 and with the only side effect a bit of nausea.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately over the last couple of months my level has risen to 11 -- not much but it probably means that it is not as effective as before.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m not sure what will happen next -- do we increase the dose or change to something else?&amp;nbsp; I see my doctor on Friday so we&amp;#39;ll talk about it then.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I wonder just how much better could it have been with dex, and is dex really needed at all?&amp;nbsp; It seems to me that most people seem to have major problems/side effects as a result of the steroids -- not necessarily because of the thalid/velcade/revlimid.&amp;nbsp; Its more about finding the drug that works best for you -- regardless of the side effects or problems that other people may have had -- and stick with it for as long as it is giving you positive results!&amp;nbsp; Best wishes to you all, Cath</description>
      <author>poppy/cath</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>