<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CancerCompass Message Board: 1st post RP PSA Reading</title>
    <description>CancerCompass message board discussion started by Hawk1 on 2/15/2008</description>
    <link>http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,20988,0.htm</link>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>RSS.NET: http://www.rssdotnet.com/</generator>
    <item>
      <title>1st post RP PSA Reading</title>
      <description>It took (3) 14 needle biopsies over 2.5 years to find my prostate cancer.&amp;nbsp; My pre RP PSA&amp;#39;s were 5.2 - 7.1 BIOPSY 16.1 -&amp;nbsp; BIOPSY 8.2 -&amp;nbsp; 8.1 -&amp;nbsp; 8.7 BIOPSY.&amp;nbsp; At the last biopsy 2 needles hit 4/4 PC.&amp;nbsp; A few needle hit PIN&amp;nbsp;I am 3 years and 10 months post RP (Laproscopic) at Memorial Slone-Kettering Cancer Center. Gleason 8Clear surgical margins, negative nodes, seminal vesicles, etc. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;My post RP PSA&amp;#39;s have all been &amp;lt;.1 which is the lowest detectable PSA at the lab I used.&amp;nbsp; At 3 yr 10 months I just got a .1 PSA.&amp;nbsp; I immediately found a lab that measures to 2 decimal places and will have results Monday. This should help me track the doubling rate more easily.&amp;nbsp; I obviously do not curently know my PSA velocity since this is my first reading.&amp;nbsp; It came just as I was starting to relax.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Since it has only been one week, I am still trying to comprehend it all.&amp;nbsp; I am an information hound and I am researching options.&amp;nbsp; With Gleason 8, I am frankly wondering what my future holds how much good time I am likely to have. &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <author>Hawk1</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ProstaScint</title>
      <description>OK, after reading the forum, I feel a little embarrassed that my previous message was a bit melodramatic because so many face greater trials at their stage of the journey.&amp;nbsp; It gives me perspective but I also feel the need to be realistic and to plan.&amp;nbsp; My concern has always been not being able to be a strength and support to my wife to the end.&amp;nbsp; It is tough to see her worry about me.&amp;nbsp;I do not read much about the ProstaScint which seems like it would be advised prior to randomly radiating the prostate bed in the hope that it is the site of PC. </description>
      <author>Hawk1</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: ProstaScint</title>
      <description>As you imply, If there is recurrence several years after surgery it&amp;#39;s more usually local. More early PSA rises, especially in the first year are ominous indicators of metastases.If it becomes necessary to consider future treatment options, it could be worth&amp;nbsp;investigating&amp;nbsp; HIFU, which I heard has been used&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;for salvage treatments. It&amp;#39;s worthwhile reading the book by Dr Myers who used radiation and hormonal treatment for his own high risk PC.</description>
      <author>Johnw100</author>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some Good News ?</title>
      <description>OK,&amp;nbsp; I just got the results of my more sensitive PSA carried to two decimal places.&amp;nbsp; Instead of .1 it was .06 which could mean that my jump from &amp;gt;.1 to .1 was only a jump of 1 - 2 hundredths of a point.&amp;nbsp; I assume this could be a negligible movement.QUESTION: Is there a rule of thumb for what a 2 decimal place PSA reading is likely to be after a RP? &amp;nbsp;PS: I just turned 58 yrs old and I am 46 months post surgery with confirmed Gleason 8 </description>
      <author>Hawk1</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>correction</title>
      <description>I made a typo above.I meant a jump from &amp;lt;.1 to .1</description>
      <author>Hawk1</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: correction</title>
      <description>View &amp;nbsp;of PSA and quality of &amp;nbsp;tests varies a lot between labs:MSK regard under .05 as undetectable, others have higher&amp;nbsp; thresholds.A definition of rising PSA is three&amp;nbsp; higher peaks.</description>
      <author>Johnw100</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>