<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CancerCompass Message Board: melphalan-based transplant </title>
    <description>CancerCompass message board discussion started by YanaMom on 5/1/2008</description>
    <link>http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,23607,0.htm</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>RSS.NET: http://www.rssdotnet.com/</generator>
    <item>
      <title>melphalan-based transplant </title>
      <description>http://www.oncologystat.com/journals/journal_scans/High-dose can it be done after revlimid-dex-dox?</description>
      <author>YanaMom</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: melphalan-based transplant</title>
      <description>Good Morning Yanamom;&amp;quot;Although the patients treated with a TTP regimen were healthier prior to transplantation than were those in the other groups, the 92-month OS is still a remarkable achievement. Patients who achieved a CR or underwent a second transplant also had more favorable results. The authors thus recommend that patients be treated according to an established protocol, and if possible, receive the TTP-3 regimen.&amp;quot;I reviewed the link you posted but couldn&amp;#39;t find anything more concerning what is involved with the TTP-3 Regimen. Can you help me?Take care;Kevin</description>
      <author>K. C.</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: melphalan-based transplant</title>
      <description>&amp;nbsp;On 5/1/2008 K. C. wrote:Good Morning Yanamom;&amp;quot;Although the patients treated with a TTP regimen were healthier prior to transplantation than were those in the other groups, the 92-month OS is still a remarkable achievement. Patients who achieved a CR or underwent a second transplant also had more favorable results. The authors thus recommend that patients be treated according to an established protocol, and if possible, receive the TTP-3 regimen.&amp;quot;I reviewed the link you posted but couldn&amp;#39;t find anything more concerning what is involved with the TTP-3 Regimen. Can you help me?Take care;Kevinyou got me there. have a look here: I think the key is in the investigator conclusions, though it is mostly greek to me.http://www.meds.com/conrad/ash/powles.html &amp;nbsp;though a bit of digging at the UAMS page revealed stage 2 trialhttp://myeloma.uams.edu/about-myeloma/swog_0115.asp Now I am extremely confused. At least this trial appears in both previously untreated and previously treated sections. But the article gives an impression of finished trials. frustrated.</description>
      <author>YanaMom</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: melphalan-based transplant</title>
      <description>http://multiplemyeloma.org/treatments/3.03.05.php &amp;nbsp;Maybe this link would be clearer.&amp;nbsp; On 5/1/2008 YanaMom wrote:&amp;nbsp;On 5/1/2008 K. C. wrote:Good Morning Yanamom;&amp;quot;Although the patients treated with a TTP regimen were healthier prior to transplantation than were those in the other groups, the 92-month OS is still a remarkable achievement. Patients who achieved a CR or underwent a second transplant also had more favorable results. The authors thus recommend that patients be treated according to an established protocol, and if possible, receive the TTP-3 regimen.&amp;quot;I reviewed the link you posted but couldn&amp;#39;t find anything more concerning what is involved with the TTP-3 Regimen. Can you help me?Take care;Kevinyou got me there. have a look here: I think the key is in the investigator conclusions, though it is mostly greek to me.http://www.meds.com/conrad/ash/powles.html  &amp;nbsp;though a bit of digging at the UAMS page revealed stage 2 trialhttp://myeloma.uams.edu/about-myeloma/swog_0115.asp  Now I am extremely confused. At least this trial appears in both previously untreated and previously treated sections. But the article gives an impression of finished trials. frustrated.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <author>mmsurvivor</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: melphalan-based transplant</title>
      <description>Thank you - it helped.</description>
      <author>YanaMom</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>