CancerCompass message board discussion started by Sunwatt on 10/8/2006 http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,7158,0.htm Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 GMT Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 GMT http://backend.userland.com/rss RSS.NET: http://www.rssdotnet.com/ Hi, just joined but I've been involved with skin cancer a couple years. I helped a friend remove a diagnosed cancer from her nose. And I've done the same on myself too. Removed growths from my nose, arm, neck, ear and my back. I've got a pretty good understanding of the classic reaction to cancer when bloodroot salve is applied. Most recently I took a growth off my brother and laws nose, he had the classic reaction to salve. He's all cleared up, and no longer has any sign of it. If anyone has questions on this post, or contact me, I'll try and help. I do not sell anything, but can offer my experience. Has anyone used bloodroot salve on breast cancer? Sunwatt Sun, 08 Oct 2006 00:00:00 GMT picture of a person treated with bloodroot: http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Gifs/conrad256.jpg full article on bloodroot: http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/eschar.html To the base note writer: this is not a personal attack on you. I am certain you mean well. But no matter how well your intentions are, you are recommending a dangerous substance. I do not want people who have skin cancer to lose their one chance of cure. This is not my opinion. This is the opinion of the scientific community. This is a dangerous substance. The FDA considers using bloodroot to cure cancer to be quackery and has revoked one persons license to practice medicine as a result, and another person is under felony investigation. The FDA does not go after harmless quackery cures, only dangerous ones. felony charges: http://steelturman.typepad.com/thesteeldeal/2005/11/thats_doctor_qu.html Amnia Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 GMT Yes thats the line from the FDA. But I didnt join this group to argue with you or talk about government agencies. I can show you websites of a couple animals cured of cancer if you like. http://www.diamondjdonkeys.com/Sassie.htm Chemo failed this animal, but bloodroot saved its life. Feel free to email the onwers who used bloodroot. The very cansema the FDA banned saved its life. The next one is a cat who had SCC on its face. http://sunwatt.mystarband.net/canceroptionsP2.htm This cat, Elmo is still alive and well. It works on people too, naturally. But people are scared off by the govt claims, so feel better about trying it on animals that vets failed to cure, so nothing else left to try. I understand that thinking I guess. I have a friend who was diagnosed with skin cancer and she removed the cancer with bloodroot and it didnt come back. As I said, I've used bloodroot salve myself, and so I can offer my support to anyone interested in going down this road. But I'm not here for this BS banter about the FDA. I'm here to support anyone who is looking for alternatives to surgery and such. Its not for everyone, but if anyone is looking for an alternative to getting half their nose cut off I can offer my support. Been there, done that, it works. If you are afraid to go down this road, let your doctor do their thing. Your better off that way, no doubt. If you are ready to go by the seat of your pants, I can help. There are people who have some knowledge. Sunwatt Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:00:00 GMT what you offer is called 'testimonial evidence.' this cat was cured, that person had good results. the single largest advance in the last hundred years isn't vaccines or antibiotics, it is the randomized clinical trial. A randomized trial is the only way to determine whether or not a treatment is effective. Somebody stating "this treatment worked for me" is what is known as 'testimonial evidence' and is statistically invalid. I urge anyone reading this to view cancer treatments that have not been put through clinical trials with a high degree of suspicion. Amnia Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:00:00 GMT