<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CancerCompass Message Board: cystocsopy  and urovision vs additional biopsy</title>
    <description>CancerCompass message board discussion started by Skowe on 1/8/2007</description>
    <link>http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,8703,0.htm</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>RSS.NET: http://www.rssdotnet.com/</generator>
    <item>
      <title>cystocsopy  and urovision vs additional biopsy</title>
      <description>i am 57 and male. have cis and tcc, t1 ggade&amp;nbsp; 3 in jan 06. one year later after 3 tur&amp;#39;s one 6 wkly bcg then one 6 wkly bcg w/interfuron i had no tumors present during my cystoscopy in dec o6. then the fish test of urine [urovision] showed negative as well. 2and fish test showed displasia. isn&amp;#39;t this enough to start maintanence treatments without further need of biopsy? skowe</description>
      <author>Skowe</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>