Nobody explained anything ,according to the report,they couldnt see anything clearly, then the oncologist said something entirely different,I cant understand him anyways,abiopsy could collapse a lung, I have had the max rads of radiation I can have,I was told, and as far as I know vulvar cancer due to HPV wasnt heard of in the 80s specially with a radical vulvectomy, pernial flaps,as a end result , HPV awareness started recently and they cant get a hold of it I understand .
So why cant a radiologist tell the difference between scar tissue and cancer or malignant and benign, ,isnt there a difference in looks, as well as growth rate... 3.2 in an upper right lobe is significant enough of a spot to consider quality as apposed to quantity of life , whats a couple more months ,a year at the outside? Why cant i get a reliable ,everyone reads and sees the same diagnoisis ,instead of opinions, pretty hard to make a judgement call w/opinions .